RESUMEN
In the present study, the occurrence of indicator antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) both in the influent and the effluent of four Spanish wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) was monitored for 12 months, and the susceptibility profiles of 89 recovered extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli isolates were obtained against a wide range of antimicrobials. The aim of the study was to better understand whether the current wastewater treatment practices allow us to obtain safe reclaimed water mitigating the spread of ARB and ARGs to the environment. Results showed high concentrations of ESBL-producing E. coli as well as a high prevalence of a range of ARGs in the influent samples. The reclamation treatments implemented in the WWTPs were effective in reducing both the occurrence of ESBL E. coli and ARGs, although significant differences were observed among WWTPs. Despite these reductions in occurrence observed upon wastewater treatment, our findings suggest that WWTP effluents may represent an important source of ARGs, which could be transferred among environmental bacteria and disseminate antimicrobial resistance through the food chain. Remarkably, no major differences were observed in the susceptibility profiles of the ESBL E. coli isolated from influent and effluent waters, indicating that water treatments do not give rise to the emergence of new resistance phenotypes.
RESUMEN
A case study of 15 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) at a full-scale was assessed for the risks of disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation, mainly the regulated trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) and chlorate as an inorganic byproduct regulated recently in the EU. Raw wastewater from large, medium/small urban areas were treated with single or combined disinfection processes (i.e., chlorine, peracetic acid (PAA) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation). Sampling was executed once a month over seven months for the medium/small WWTPs and twice a month for the large ones. Due to the potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 contaminated wastewater, several inactivation methods were examined before the DBP analysis. Due to the inactivation step, the stability of THM4 and HAA9 suffered reductions, monitoring their presence only in the effluents after the disinfection treatments. In contrast, chlorate levels remained unchanged after the inactivation treatment; thus both raw wastewater and effluents were examined for their occurrence before disinfection treatments. Results showed that chlorate residues in the raw wastewater varied greatly from undetected levels to as high as 42.2 mg L-1. As the continuous monitoring of DBPs was performed, a positive correlation with chlorine or chlorine/UV was found. Changes in the physicochemical parameters indicated that the quality of the raw wastewater varied considerably depending on the WWTPs, and it influenced byproduct formation. In all WWTPs, chlorine alone or combined with UV significantly increased the presence of THMs, HAAs, and chlorate levels in the treated effluents. When the same WWTPs changed to PAA or PAA/UV, DBPs were diminished completely. This study highlights the risk of chlorate residues in raw wastewater during the pandemic. It also showed how the chemical risks of DBP formation could be reduced by changing the chlorinated disinfection technologies to PAA or PAA/UV, particularly if reclaimed water is intended for agricultural irrigation to minimize DBP residues.
